For years there seemed to be only one efficient solution to keep data on your personal computer – with a hard disk drive (HDD). Then again, this type of technology is currently showing it’s age – hard drives are actually loud and slow; they are power–hungry and have a tendency to create quite a lot of warmth in the course of serious operations.

SSD drives, in contrast, are really fast, take in a lesser amount of energy and they are far less hot. They offer a brand new approach to file access and data storage and are years in advance of HDDs regarding file read/write speed, I/O performance and also power effectivity. Observe how HDDs stand up against the modern SSD drives.

1. Access Time

Image

SSD drives present a brand–new & ground breaking method to data safe–keeping in accordance with the usage of electronic interfaces as an alternative to any sort of moving parts and revolving disks. This innovative technology is much quicker, making it possible for a 0.1 millisecond data file access time.

Image

HDD drives still take advantage of the exact same general file access technology which was actually created in the 1950s. Despite the fact that it was substantially upgraded since then, it’s slower compared with what SSDs are offering to you. HDD drives’ data file access speed ranges in between 5 and 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

Image

The random I/O performance is important for the general performance of any data file storage device. We’ve conducted extensive trials and have established an SSD can deal with at the least 6000 IO’s per second.

Image

Hard drives feature reduced data access speeds because of the aging file storage and accessibility technique they are by making use of. And in addition they show substantially slower random I/O performance when compared to SSD drives.

During 121 Webhost’s tests, HDD drives maintained around 400 IO operations per second.

3. Reliability

Image

SSD drives don’t have virtually any moving components, which means there is a lesser amount of machinery inside them. And the less actually moving components there are, the lower the prospect of failing will be.

The normal rate of failing of an SSD drive is 0.5%.

Image

HDD drives make use of rotating disks for holding and reading through data – a concept dating back to the 1950s. With hard disks magnetically hanging in the air, rotating at 7200 rpm, the likelihood of something failing are considerably increased.

The average rate of failure of HDD drives ranges among 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

Image

SSD drives work nearly soundlessly; they don’t generate excess heat; they don’t involve more cooling down methods and consume significantly less energy.

Trials have indicated that the normal power intake of an SSD drive is somewhere between 2 and 5 watts.

Image

HDD drives are famous for becoming loud. They need a lot more electricity for cooling applications. Within a server which includes a large number of HDDs running regularly, you need a large amount of fans to ensure that they’re cooler – this may cause them much less energy–efficient than SSD drives.

HDDs use up between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

Image

The faster the file access speed is, the swifter the data file calls are going to be treated. As a result the CPU will not have to reserve assets expecting the SSD to reply back.

The common I/O delay for SSD drives is actually 1%.

Image

In comparison to SSDs, HDDs permit not so quick data access speeds. The CPU must lose time waiting for the HDD to return the required data, saving its assets in the meantime.

The typical I/O wait for HDD drives is about 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

Image

It’s time for some real–world illustrations. We, at 121 Webhost, ran an entire platform backup with a server only using SSDs for data storage uses. In that operation, the regular service time for any I/O query remained below 20 ms.

Image

All through the very same trials using the same hosting server, now suited out with HDDs, general performance was noticeably slower. Throughout the hosting server data backup procedure, the regular service time for I/O demands varied somewhere between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

Image

Referring to back–ups and SSDs – we’ve observed a fantastic progress with the back up speed since we transferred to SSDs. Currently, a typical server backup can take solely 6 hours.

Image

We made use of HDDs mainly for a few years and we have got great knowledge of how an HDD runs. Backing up a web server furnished with HDD drives is going to take about 20 to 24 hours.

If you want to easily enhance the overall performance of your respective sites while not having to modify just about any code, an SSD–powered hosting solution is really a excellent solution. Check the Linux shared hosting packages and our Linux VPS – these hosting solutions have quick SSD drives and can be found at inexpensive price points.


  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • Each of our Virtual Private Servers is put together for you free of cost. 99.9% network uptime. Full admin server access.
  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Examine the instruments and characteristics offered by our Virtual Private Servers. You can start off with a smaller VPS setup and upgrade with simply a mouse click as your requirements expand.
  • Compare our hosting plans
  • Contact Us

  •  
  • We’re on duty for you round the clock to reply to any sort of questions concerning our VPS platform. 1–hour response time frame warranty.